"No government's Deep State is inherently dangerous; what's of concern to red blooded Americans, however, is that their Deep State is in bed with the enemy." - AlleKat 2021

Snopes has tipped its hand. Link is posted below. No degree in rocket science is necessary to see how desperately Biden and the Democrats are trying to twist what happened Jan 6th (the republican attempted insurrection) and make “white male republicans” appear as dangerous as any other terrorists, . . . Isis, Al Qaeda, old world KKK democrats, etc. Democrats (as do republicans but they're not as good at it) have been exercising deception for a decades. Unless you're a walking moron, it's clear to you what it is people were trying to do when they said, "America's president is in bed with America's most terrifying enemy" (ref: Russia collusion hoax). Might Snopes criticize me by saying, "No, democrats never said, "Trump is sleeping with Putin." People can nitpick the letter of what was said and totally twist the spirit of what was said, this is often done to favor a biased perspective. Snopes might well publish: "Tucker is misleading you; Tucker said, “The guy stabbed her ten times”, however, she, in fact, was never stabbed ten times. . . (OK; 7 times but let us focus on Tucker's deception)". Snopes clear intention is to promote the following bias .... "Fox News Tucker Carlson lies and is trying to mislead Americans." The takeaway is this: Snopes has finally "tipped its hand" in a most obvious and blatant way. It is now clear that they have abandoned objective analysis in favor of biased analysis. I think most people can clearly see the most recently adopted member of the AMB; American Misleading Business" . . . No, Biden Did Not Say 'White Republican Men' Are 'More Dangerous Than Isis' | Snopes.com

I think the main problem with society today is that many  people holding influential positions can't read. They have a difficult time comprehending the meaning (context) of words and symbols. Look at the last sentence of Trump's tweet, it posts a question for consideration, it's not a statement of fact, nor does it imply that the POTUS has the power to do anything about "the day elections are held".

Trump's Tweet . . .

With Universal Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good), 2020 will be the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history. It will be a great embarrassment to the USA. Delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote???

5:46 AM · Jul 30, 2020

The following link takes you to Walter Olson's (one page) moronic article "Nov. 3rd, whether he likes it or not" . . .

https://www.cato.org/blog/us-presidential-election-will-take-place-november-3-whether-president-likes-it-or-not?utm_campaign=Cato%20Today&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=92409539&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-98qSkfgnQl-sgqxVgr82TO6VWeIg1k-QQ-jWDviv-7gf-KYiTeCtkXO2PqyMcthbKxHWgrU9cNrB9MxyRyj5LEdKcnui-hn9YGNG9dCDSxbFgg7gA&utm_content=92409539&utm_source=hs_email

- CAS

It's true, the burden of freedom, and the choices that come with freedom, and the cost of freedom, are too great for most everyone. And so they turn to choosing leaders to tell them what to do, this is what creates the elites, the ruling class, the teachers, etc. Rather than choose, people follow. The followers are actually the cause of the elites and the ruling class. Note Shepherds have never taken up the profession of  “herding cats”.   

I personally hate to concern myself with what I consider irrelevant choices. Such as what clothes to wear, what deodorant to use, which soap to buy, which leaders to support or vote for, etc. Unless I'm convinced an issue is going to make a huge difference in myself or the world, I refuse to think about it. I keep things as simple as possible (within reason, I hope). 

The problem with "Forfeiting Choice" is this: When we forfeit choice, we are doomed to trust the choices others (of authority) make for us; be it a teacher, boss, legislator, etc. People always, on earth or at any star, are better off being burdened with the freedom "to make each and every choice on their own" rather than being burdened with having to choose "trusted others" to choose for them. Historically, the choice of the "trusted others" (however their "good intentions") has never worked out well, and has led to mass suffering, poverty and death. This is happens because nobody is qualified and can be trusted to choose what's good for everybody "or . . . anybody" other than themselves.  The good thing about capitalism is that choices aren't universal or permanent (most all  choices, by law, are made individually. NOT collectively or universally). That way when things go bad, or worse, people often see it and choose to change their choices (or behavior) before it’s too late.  

The burden of freedom is HUGE. This is why the choice "not to choose" is hugely popular and is surely understandable. But it’s wrong to suggest that the choice  “not to choose” (or leave choice up to The Man) is a good thing to do. It’s wrong in the most fundamental and extreme sense of wrongness. 

 - AK 2020

“Democracy is precarious for the same reason mob rule is precarious.”

"People don't always get what they ask for, but they always get what they pay for...
"Laissez Faire Capitalism is what it is. But there is no market for such a thing right now. If and when there is a demand for it - it will come.

It's that simple."  - AlleKat 2013         

This Blog is open to everyone - please keep it clean! Call Craig directly, anytime at (530) 227 - 3503 USA.